It would actually be less
scary if he used that drill for dental work.
Okay,
so that
might be an extremely unlikely outcome of throwing social responsibility
to the
wind (even barring underwater cities and gene-splicing crazies), but it
does paint
a fittingly grim picture of doing so. Last
week I talked about the business merits of social responsibility. Now I
would like to focus on a common
counterpoint to the subject; that is, “I worked hard, and I succeeded on
my
own! Nobody helped me, so why should I
help everyone else?” I will be the first
to admit this point seems like a valid one on the surface, and very much
irrefutable outside of moral reasoning.
However, from a logical perspective, it is fundamentally flawed when you
consider how our economic system, business in general, and society on
the whole
operates. Success, by and large, is
often measured by financial wealth, which can only be obtained by some
practice
of business (even at its basest form of simple buying and selling).
Business, by its nature, requires society. It requires other people, to
sell to, to buy
from, and appeal to. Like I said last
week, we are all businesspeople. Therefore,
no matter what, you owe your success to society.
This is not to
take away from those who made significant sacrifices to their social lives and
mental health and risks to their financial stability in order to become
successful—I am only pointing out you really were not alone in your success. It is rarely an easy road to success, no
matter how you define it, and it takes copious dedication and determination. Entrepreneurs and business visionaries keep
the world going ‘round. There is no
doubt they are invaluable to society, but yet they would have achieved nothing
without society. So, when you think
about it, social responsibility is really social accountability. A company is accountable to its stakeholders,
and it just so happens we all have a stake in the business oils that makes the
societal cogs turn.
Hamster wheel analogies just seem irrelevant
now that they all drive Kias.
Of course, there
will always be those who abuse the system.
Not every person is going to be a productive member of society, and some
will gladly leech off the sweat of others their entire lives. The savvy businessperson understands people
who do this are like defective units at your production plant in that they are
an inevitability given an imperfect manufacturing process (in this case, the
great many variables of life experiences which may produce such perspectives),
work against you by being expensive (by leeching off society) and unprofitable
(by not contributing), and require you to always be working on ways to minimize
their occurrence. Since we have already established
society and business are one in the same, the logical solution to reduce the
amount of unproductive people is to make society better. This, of course, is done by increasing
quality of life through social responsibility programs. Giving back to society to educate people, as
well as keeping them healthy and happy, will only make them more productive and
successful. As we talked about last
week, this creates wealth, which leads to increased spending, which leads to
the creation of more wealth, and so on.
So, there you
have it: a logical reason why we should
all care about each other, if only because we care about ourselves. I tried to be impartial when presenting this
argument, but the reality is I am not only a businessperson, but also a proponent
of progress. What else is the ultimate
goal of life other than progress, anyway?
Be it for our own progeny or the mankind as a whole, really everything
we do is to make life better. Progress
stems from innovation, and innovation is an organizational process these
days. That is a good thing, too, as I
think working as a team generally makes things easier. Besides, like all worthwhile things in life,
success means nothing without people to share it with. In the words of Albert Pike, “What we have
done for ourselves alone dies with us; what we have done for others and the
world remains and is immortal.” We are
all in this together, people, and it is in all our best interest to work
together to be successful together so we stay
successful together.


Good article and made some good points. Although I don't agree with everything. Like where do you draw the line of what someone has to give back? I talked to a friend who is actively involved with the DNC and got him to admit that penalizing incomes over a certain amount is just Karma for the rich screwing the poor over for so many years. He says now the tables are reversing WTF? As if all "wealthy" people get rich by screwing over the poor and not by merit. Don't get me wrong however I do believe there are some greedy capitalist bastards that underpay employees for the jobs they do and laugh all the way to the bank but where is the line and do you cross the line of redistribution of wealth which brings up the nasty word socialism? What is really considered wealth and how much extra should they pay?
ReplyDelete